Stay updated with the most recent editions of ODT Magazine, featuring comprehensive coverage of the latest innovations and developments.
Access the full digital version of ODT Magazine, complete with interactive features and enhanced content for a seamless reading experience.
Join the ODT community! Subscribe to receive the latest industry news and insights delivered directly to your mailbox.
Discover how 3D printing and additive manufacturing are revolutionizing orthopedic device design and production processes.
Learn about contract manufacturing solutions in the orthopedic sector, emphasizing quality, compliance, and operational excellence.
Stay informed on the latest research and development trends in orthopedic device design, driving innovation and patient care improvements.
Explore the latest advancements in surgical instruments and technologies that enhance precision and outcomes in orthopedic procedures.
Discover cutting-edge machining and laser processing techniques that improve the quality and performance of orthopedic devices.
Learn about the innovative materials shaping orthopedic devices, focusing on performance, biocompatibility, and regulatory compliance.
Stay updated on advanced molding techniques for producing high-quality orthopedic components that meet industry standards.
Explore best practices for packaging and sterilization methods that ensure the safety and efficacy of orthopedic devices.
Discover the role of software solutions in enhancing orthopedic device design, functionality, patient management, and regulatory compliance.
Learn about essential testing methods and standards that ensure the safety, reliability, and effectiveness of orthopedic devices.
Stay ahead with real-time updates on significant news impacting the orthopedic device sector.
Access unique content and insights not available in the print edition of ODT Magazine, offering deeper dives into important topics.
Explore feature articles that provide in-depth analysis on specific topics within orthopedic design and technology.
Gain insights from industry experts through regular columns addressing critical challenges and innovations in orthopedics.
Read the editorial insights on current trends and highlights from the latest issue of ODT Magazine.
Discover leading companies in orthopedic design and technology, showcasing their innovations and contributions to the field.
Explore detailed profiles of companies in the orthopedic device manufacturing sector, highlighting their capabilities and offerings.
Learn about the expertise and resources of leading companies in the orthopedic device manufacturing sector.
Watch informative videos featuring industry leaders discussing trends, technologies, and innovations in orthopedic design.
Enjoy short, engaging videos that provide quick insights and updates on key topics within orthopedics.
Tune in to discussions with industry experts sharing their insights on trends, challenges, and innovations in orthopedic technology.
Participate in informative webinars led by industry experts covering various relevant topics in orthopedic design and manufacturing.
Stay informed on the latest press releases and announcements from leading companies in the orthopedic device manufacturing sector.
Access comprehensive eBooks that delve into various topics in orthopedic device manufacturing and innovation.
Highlighting the pioneers and innovators driving advancements in orthopedic technology and patient care.
Explore sponsored articles and insights from leading companies in the orthopedic industry.
Read in-depth whitepapers that examine key issues, trends, and research findings in orthopedic design and technology.
Discover major industry events, trade shows, and conferences focused on orthopedic technology and innovations.
Get real-time updates and insights from major industry shows and exhibitions happening around the world.
Participate in the ODT Forum, addressing orthopedic design and manufacturing technology trends, innovations, and industry challenges.
Attend the MPO Summit for insights and strategies from industry leaders shaping the future of medical device technology.
Join discussions and networking opportunities at the MPO Medtech Forum, focusing on the latest trends and challenges in the industry.
Explore advertising opportunities with ODT to connect with a targeted audience of orthopedic professionals.
Review our editorial guidelines for submissions and contributions to ODT.
Read about our commitment to protecting your privacy and personal information.
Familiarize yourself with the terms and conditions governing the use of odtmag.com.
What are you searching for?
Experts call for additional studies to identify optimal treatment strategies.
August 28, 2014
By: Michael Barbella
A study of treatment outcomes for clavicle fractures in adolescents found that although refracture is more common in patients who receive nonsurgical treatment, overall complication rates are higher in those who undergo surgery, with the most common complication being implant-related symptoms. According to Benton E. Heyworth, M.D., who conducted the study along with colleagues from Boston Children’s Hospital, the question of whether to surgically treat the adolescent with a middiaphyseal clavicle fracture is “an area of significant controversy.” The issue has gained attention as greater numbers of clavicle fractures are being seen in the adolescent population, with more than 60 percent of cases occurring during sports activities. In recent years, the trend has been toward increasing use of surgical treatment, Heyworth said. In conducting this study, he and his colleagues sought to better understand the issue by reviewing the demographic characteristics, treatment approaches, and complications in a large series of adolescent clavicle fractures receiving surgical or nonsurgical treatment. The investigators reviewed radiographic and medical records for 641 patients aged 10 to 18 years with middiaphyseal clavicle fractures who were seen between 2003 and 2012. Demographic data, radiographic features such as fracture pattern, operative details when applicable, and posttreatment clinical course were analyzed, including the reported time to healing and any known complications. Of the cases reviewed, 79 percent of the injuries were sustained by males; the mean age was 14.3 years. Nearly two-thirds (64 percent) of the fractures were sustained during sports, most frequently football (25 percent), hockey (18 percent), soccer (12 percent), snowboarding (12 percent) and skiing (9 percent). Other common mechanisms of injury were falls sustained outside of athletic activity (19 percent) and motor vehicle accidents (5 percent). Surgical and nonsurgical treatment groups had similar distribution of mechanisms of injury and similar rates of associated injuries (5 percent in the surgical group and 6 percent in the nonsurgical group).
Greater numbers of clavicle fractures were seen annually as the study period progressed. Among the overall cohort, 82 percent were treated nonsurgically, while 18 percent were treated surgically; the percentage of patients undergoing surgery increased during the study period.
The mean age was higher in the surgically treated group (15.5 years) than the nonsurgically treated group (14.1 years) (P < 0.001). There were 58 documented complications in 46 patients (7.2 percent); such complications were more common in older patients and significantly more common (P < 0.001), in the surgical group than in the nonsurgical group. Just one case of nonunion occurred in each treatment group.
The rate of symptomatic implants was 13 percent in the surgical group (leading to plate removal in 9 percent of cases), while the rate of symptomatic malunion was 2 percent in the nonsurgical group. Refracture was significantly more common in the nonsurgical group (3 percent) than in the surgical group (2 percent). No infections were reported in either group. “One of the key takeaways of the study is that complication rates are relatively low, overall, for both types of treatment,” Heyworth said. “Notably, nonunion and symptomatic malunion rates after nonsurgical treatment are extremely low in this age group. This is quite different from previous studies on adult populations that, to date, have had substantial influence on treatment decisions in adolescents.
“Our most important takeaway,” he continued, “may be that future prospective research is needed with more comparable matched cohort studies that are followed for longer periods with functional outcome measures. Until this subject is better studied, we hope our results on this relatively larger population can facilitate discussions with families about approximate rates of events related to each type of treatment, either of which may be reasonable for a given patient. We believe a shared decision-making approach should be pursued with patients and families.”
Enter your account email.
A verification code was sent to your email, Enter the 6-digit code sent to your mail.
Didn't get the code? Check your spam folder or resend code
Set a new password for signing in and accessing your data.
Your Password has been Updated !